UK on the right track: NO!
Stratford-upon-Avon: 23 - 24 September 2009
The presentations made at the AGI GeoCommunity '09 - 'Realising the Value of Place' conference have been published.
The presentations included one made by the Chair of the UK Locus Association Audrey Mandela on the 23rd September 2009 titled: Public Sector Information Policy: On the Right Track? The LOCUS presentation states why the playing field is not level (Slide 7)
- Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) has no real regulatory power
- OPSI obliged to support government policy – not all stakeholders
- PSI Holders have substantial resource to defend their business models. (OPSI’s entire annual budget is less that OS spends on lawyers alone)
- “Information Fair Trader Scheme” is an “agreement” designed to encourage best practice – not to enforce it. Not open to Judicial Review
- OPSI’s only sanctions are too nuclear
- The PSI Regulations exclude vital PSI and need tightening
- The National Audit Office remit is too high-level
- The Office of Fair Trading can only “investigate” 1 in 30 complaints
- Stimulating PSI re-use requires all barriers to be removed
The presentation ends by answering the question What is needed? (Slide 11)
- Decisions about what government should be doing in this space
- Information about what PSI is available
- Clarity about use conditions
- A level competitive playing-filed. Some Trading Funds are almost certainly acting anti-competitively. Privatisation is thus impossible.
- A review process that is relatively swift, low cost, open, adequately independent and robust.
- Transparent outcomes within a realistic timetable.
- Certainty that decisions will be implemented promptly
Related news topics
- 226 reads


